A judge rules against a Pennsylvania man's deportation whose '80s murder conviction was dismissed

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A judge cleared the way Thursday for the potential release of an Indian citizen who was taken into Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody last year after his Pennsylvania murder conviction was overturned following four decades in prison.

Associated Press

The decision came after a four-hour hearing in which Subramanyam Vedam insisted he did not fatally shoot Thomas Kinser in 1980 and was questioned by a Department of Homeland Security lawyer. Vedam participated in the hearing Wednesday remotely from theMoshannon Valley Processing Centerin Philipsburg, Pennsylvania.

"I was young and stupid and did a lot of dumb things back then," Vedam said. The federal government wants to deport the 64-year-old to India, which he left as a baby in 1962.

U.S. Immigration Judge Adam Panopoulos said Vedam proved he was genuinely rehabilitated and did not pose a danger to the public. He cited Vedam's efforts to improve literacy among inmates and his close ties to his family, including nieces who have never known him as a free man.

Vedam "has grown as a person" and "began to dedicate himself to enriching other people's lives and ultimately his own through academic study and enrichment," the judge said Thursday.

A DHS lawyer said he can still be deported on unrelated drug distribution convictions.

Vedam, known as Subu, was born in Mumbai, India, and was brought to the United States when he was 9 months old. He grew up in State College, Pennsylvania, where his father was a physics professor. He is a legal permanent resident of the United States and was days away from becoming a naturalized citizen when he was arrested.

DHS has a month to appeal

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has a month to appeal. Vedam's lawyer indicated he plans to seek his client's release on bond.

His attorney, Ava Benach, said Vedam hopes to live with a relative in Sacramento, California, and has been offered a spot in Oregon State University's doctoral program in applied anthropology.

Late last year, the State College prosecutor declined to retry Vedam after a Centre County judge determined that relevant ballistics evidence had not been disclosed by prosecutors during Vedam's two trials. Vedam had been on the verge of being freed in October when ICE agentstook him into custodyand sought todeport him.

Advertisement

Vedam told Panopoulos he turned down plea bargain offers during his first trial and that prosecutors made similar overtures during his retrial. Both ended in first-degree murder convictions.

"I never stopped saying I was innocent of this charge," Vedam told the judge. He has been behind bars since March 31, 1982.

Vedam and Kinser had been high school friends and both were 19 years old when Kinser disappeared. He was last seen alive after taking Vedam to buy drugs in December 1980. Kinser's van was found outside his apartment in State College and it was more than nine months later that hikers came across his remains in a sinkhole miles away. He had been shot in the head. The gun was never found.

Vedam was arrested on drug charges and eventually accused and convicted of Kinser's murder.

Prosecutor declines a third trial

Jurors were told Vedam purchased a stolen .25-caliber gun and ammunition around the time Kinser disappeared but were not informed that an FBI report suggested Kinser's head wound was too small for bullets that size.

In an Oct. 2 release announcing his decision not to retry Vedam, Centre County District Attorney Bernie Cantorna called it "a compelling circumstantial case" but that a third trial would be difficult because of the passage of time. Cantorna cited "the reality that 44 years is a sufficient sentence for a murder committed by someone who was nineteen years old."

The prosecutor noted that Vedam had initially denied purchasing or owning a .25-caliber pistol, then testified at the second trial he purchased the gun after Kinser disappeared. Cantorna also wrote that the FBI matched "distinguishing marks" on a bullet casing found with Kinser's remains to a casing recovered from where the gun seller said Vedam had test fired it.

Despite being cleared of Kinser's murder, Vedam's no-contest pleas to LSD distribution charges put him in danger of deportation. During the Wednesday hearing, DHS lawyer Tammy Dusharm pressed Vedam about his other arrests, including for driving under the influence and theft.

Dusharm told the judge that Vedam did not deserve to stay in the United States, given that he "was using and dealing drugs, driving under the influence, committing theft-related offenses." She also brought up Vedam's statements that he sold LSD only a few times.

"I find it fairly incredible that it would appear that every single time he sold drugs, he did so to an undercover officer," Dusharm said.

A judge rules against a Pennsylvania man's deportation whose '80s murder conviction was dismissed

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A judge cleared the way Thursday for the potential release of an Indian citizen who was taken into...
Descendant of key figure in 1898 citizenship case hopes for the best from US Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, April 2 (Reuters) - While many Americans are following the U.S. Supreme Court case involving President Donald Trump's attempt to limit birthright citizenship, Norman Wong is doing so with a little bit of ‌extra motivation. For him, it is about family.

Reuters Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, looks at a picture of his family, at his home in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, March 28, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria A porter show a picture of Wong Kim Ark, at his great-grandson, Norman Wong home in San Francisco Bay Area, California, March 28, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, and his wife Maureen chat as they wait to board a plane to Washington D.C., at the San Francisco International airport in San Francisco, California, March 31, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, looks at a picture of his mother, at his home in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, March 28, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, and his wife Maureen walk by the U.S. Capitol building as they arrive at demonstration outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, looks at a picture of his family, at his home in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, March 28, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, and his wife Maureen walk by the U.S. Capitol building as they arrive at demonstration outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Norman Wong, the great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, and his wife Maureen attend a demonstration outside the U.S. Supreme Court building on the day the court hears oral arguments on the legality of the Trump administration's effort to limit birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2026. In 1898, Wong Kim Ark challenged the U.S. government after being denied re-entry to the country following a trip to his parents' homeland. Though he was born in the United States, authorities claimed he was not a citizen. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor, firmly establishing that the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Trump's quest to curb birthright citizenship echoes 128-year-old Supreme Court case

The San Francisco-area resident is the great-grandson of Wong Kim ‌Ark, the Chinese American man who was at the heart of a landmark 1898 Supreme Court decision concerning birthright citizenship. That ruling recognized that ​the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment grants citizenship by birth on U.S. soil, including to babies born to parents who are foreign nationals.

Norman Wong, 76, traveled to Washington and was outside the courthouse as the justices heard arguments on Wednesday. He told Reuters afterward that the justices should reaffirm the court's 128-year-old precedent and rule against Trump.

"I hope America gets this thing right," ‌the retired carpenter said.

When Wong Kim Ark, ⁠a cook who was in his 20s at the time, returned from a trip to his parents' homeland of China in 1895, customs officials in San Francisco declared him a non-citizen ⁠and sought to prevent him from re-entering the United States.

Though he was born in the city's Chinatown neighborhood, the officials said that because his parents were Chinese nationals, so too was he, and as such he was ineligible for entry due to an ​1882 ​law called the Chinese Exclusion Act that restricted Chinese migration and ​citizenship. The Supreme Court disagreed.

In the current case, ‌Norman Wong said, the court's nine justices should "not reinvent our rights" and should uphold "the way birthright citizenship stood for 128 years of precedents."

Advertisement

Speaking outside the Supreme Court building amid demonstrators defending birthright citizenship, he called the day of the arguments "a special day for me."

"I see these people and I feel like I definitely don't stand alone, that if I can help empower them, great. Because in the end, it's going to take America as a whole to stand up ‌and to make this country right, to keep this ship balanced."

Trump ​became the first sitting president to attend Supreme Court arguments, though he ​left midway through. At issue was the legality ​of Trump's executive order signed last year that had instructed U.S. agencies not to recognize the ‌citizenship of children born in the United States ​if neither parent is an ​American citizen or legal permanent resident, also called a "green card" holder.

"I think he was there to apply pressure to the judges for their decision," Norman Wong said. "The decision should be a constitutional decision, not a decision ​based on fear - fear of retribution, fear ‌of the president."

The justices through their questions signaled skepticism toward Trump's directive.

In a post on his Truth ​Social platform on Thursday, the Republican president wrote, "Kangaroo Court!!!"

(Reporting by Carlos Barria, Julio-César Chávez and Katharine ​Jackson; Additional reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Will Dunham)

Descendant of key figure in 1898 citizenship case hopes for the best from US Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, April 2 (Reuters) - While many Americans are following the U.S. Supreme Court case involving President Donald...
King Charles and Queen Camilla Lead Easter Tradition in Special Place for Kate Middleton and Prince William

King Charles and Queen Camilla attended the Royal Maundy Service on April 2, held in Wales for the first time since 1982

People King Charles and Queen Camilla arrive at St. Asaph cathedral in Wales on April 2, 2026Credit: Aaron Chown/PA Images via Getty

NEED TO KNOW

  • The King distributed Maundy coins to 77 men and 77 women, matching his age, in recognition of their community service

  • The Royal Maundy Service tradition dates back to 600 AD and was expanded by Queen Elizabeth to travel around the U.K.

King CharlesandQueen Camillaare gearing up for Easter in a place that's especially meaningful forPrince WilliamandKate Middleton.

On April 2, the King, 77, and Queen, 78, attended the Royal Maundy Service at St. Asaph Cathedral in north Wales. The outing marked the first time the event has been held in Wales since 1982 and only the second time in the tradition's history.

Wales is a special place for William and Kate,who were named the Prince and Princess of Wales following King Charles' accession to the thronein September 2022. The Prince of Wales is the historic title for the male heir to the throne, with William and Katepaying many impactful visits to Walessince they took on the titles. The Prince of Wales title is also poignant for King Charles, whobore the Prince of Wales title for 64 years, until his accession.

King Charles and Queen Camilla wave to well wishers as they arrive at St. Asaph on April 2, 2026Credit: Aaron Chown/PA Images via Getty

The King and Queen Camilla played a festive role at the Royal Maundy Service, which commemorates the Christian holy day on the Thursday before Easter.

There, King Charles had the honor of presenting Royal Maundy gifts to approximately 77 men and 77 women from Wales and other dioceses across the U.K., recognizing their exemplary Christian service to their communities.

The "77" number matched the monarch's age, and recipients received two purses containing the "Maundy Money." The white purse held sets of specially minted silver Maundy coins totaling 77 pennies, reflecting his number of years, while the red purse contained a £5 coin commemorating the 100th anniversary ofQueen Elizabeth's birth (later this month) and a 50p coin celebrating the 50th anniversary of The King's Trust, one of King Charles' charities.

King Charles, in tailcoat, arrives at the service in St. Asaph, Wales with Camilla on April 2, 2026Credit: Aaron Chown/PA Images via Getty

The royal family'swebsiteoutlines that the coins are all real legal tender, though it's popular to pocket them as a keepsake, with the ordinary coinage representing the sovereign's gift for food and clothing and the Maundy coins nodding to their age.

Advertisement

The church service featured specially commissioned music by Welsh composers and musicians in a celebration of a return of the Royal Maundy Service to Wales. The service also featured the processional Cross of Wales, a gift from King Charles to the Christians of Wales and cross that was used on his May 2023 coronation day. The Cross of Wales, which headed the procession for the King and Queen Camilla's crowning ceremony at Westminster Abbey almost three years ago, contains a fragment of the True Cross, a gift from the King to Pope Francis and believed to be part of the cross Jesus was crucified on.

After the service wrapped, the King and Queen joined the Royal Maundy Party for the traditional group photo outside the West Door before taking time to meet members of the cathedral community.

The Royal Maundy Service is an ancient tradition tracing back to 600 AD, honoring how Jesus washed the feet of the Apostles at the last supper. The royal family's website explains that the number of coins the monarch distributes correlates to "the number of years they have lived" and King Charles has done the honors every year of his reign,with the exclusion of 2024, shortly after it was announced that he was undergoing treatment for cancer.(The King's treatment for an undisclosed form of cancer continues, and heshared the "good news" in December 2025that his treatment would be reduced this year.)

Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage?Sign up for our free Royals newsletterto get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!

Queen Camillamade royal history as the first consort to helm the ceremonyand distribute coins at Worcester Cathedral.

The King has continued his late mother Queen Elizabeth's tradition of holding the Royal Maundy Service is held at different cathedrals or abbeys around the U.K.

Early during her record reign, Queen Elizabeth decided that the Maundy money celebration should not be exclusive to the people of London and began a new tradition of bringing the festivities to various houses of worship across the country. She impressively hit the road to visit every cathedral in the U.K. during her reign, according to Royal.UK.

Read the original article onPeople

King Charles and Queen Camilla Lead Easter Tradition in Special Place for Kate Middleton and Prince William

King Charles and Queen Camilla attended the Royal Maundy Service on April 2, held in Wales for the first time since 1982 ...
David & Victoria Beckham's Marriage Being 'Tested' — Source

Victoria BeckhamandDavid Beckhamreportedly hit a painful new crossroads as their feud with eldest son Brooklyn worsened. As per sources, the family fallout put fresh pressure on their 26-year marriage. The report linked the strain to Brooklyn's public statement about his 2022 wedding to Nicola Peltz. It also said the designer andformer soccer starwere deciding how to respond. That meant handling the dispute as parents and as two global brands.

Family feud testing Victoria and David Beckham's marriage, claims source

As per RadarOnline, David Beckham and Victoria Beckham felt the crisis had become deeply personal. One insider said their relationship was being "tested to its absolute limit" by the fight. The same source added that it was pushing them toward "an absolute breaking point." Because it centered on "their own son," the pain felt "far more personal and deeply painful." The insider also said the "emotional toll is now immense." They had weathered years of scrutiny together since their 1999 wedding, but the report said this felt different.

Advertisement

The report said the latest rupture followedBrooklyn'spublic post about Nicola Peltz and their 2022 wedding. His complaints reportedly touched on the first dance, the dress issue, and control of his name. Meanwhile, insiders said Victoria struggled to square those claims with her past bond with Brooklyn. One source said the accusations "did not reflect the son she raised." RadarOnline also said Victoria believed the family dynamic shifted sharply after Brooklyn's marriage. In addition, the outlet said the breakdown intensified after the wedding and left the singer shaken.

At the same time, RadarOnline said outside producers had floated a documentary about the fallout. Sources claimed the idea was to "rebalance the narrative" afterBrooklyn'sversion dominated headlines. Another insider said the couple faced "difficult conversations" about whether to answer publicly. That source added that any documentary would help them "regain control of the narrative" and "clarify their position." The outlet said that the approach was meant to answer claims without speaking in scattered public replies. For now, nothing was confirmed. Still, the report said the feud created an "unprecedented level of tension" in their marriage.

The postDavid & Victoria Beckham's Marriage Being 'Tested' — Sourceappeared first onReality Tea.

David & Victoria Beckham’s Marriage Being ‘Tested’ — Source

Victoria BeckhamandDavid Beckhamreportedly hit a painful new crossroads as their feud with eldest son Brooklyn worsened. As per sources, th...

 

NEO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com