Where Is Don King Now? All About the Promoter's Tumultuous Life After Working with Michael Jackson

Don King is a prominent boxing promoter whose career has faced several controversies

People Michael Jackson and Don King in 1983; Don King attends a fight in Hollywood, Fla., in June 2024Credit: Bettmann/Getty; Chris Arjoon/Getty

NEED TO KNOW

  • King worked with the Jacksons to promote their 1984 Victory Tour

  • He reportedly feuded with Michael both during and after the tour

Don Kingis a longtime boxing promoter who has organized several major events over the years — includingThe Jacksons' 1984 Victory Tour.

King made a name for himself in the boxing world after working withMuhammad Alifrom a young age and went on to promote matches with several major names — includingGeorge Foreman,Mike Tyson,Julio César Chávez,Joe FrazierandChristy Martin, among others.

However, many of his former clients later sued him on allegations of fraud and several of them have criticized him for allegedly worsening the boxing climate. Between 1954 and 1966, he killed two people; one was deemed "justifiable homicide," perThe New York Times,and the other charge was reduced to manslaughter in 1972 after he served over three years of his original sentence.

After his legal problems, King was chosen byJoe Jacksonto promote and organize his sons' The Jacksons' Victory Tour in 1984. Joe reportedly encouraged his sons, includingMichael Jackson, to work with King, because he promised the family an advance of $3 million, according toTIME.

The Victory Tour marked the only time all six brothers —Michael,Jermaine, Randy,Tito,MarlonandJackie— went on tour together and was also the last time Michael performed with them before fully embracing his solo career. The Victory Tour andMichael's decision to depart from his familyprofessionally was a major plot point in the 2026 biopicMichael, in whichDeon Coleportrayed King.

Here's everything to know about where Don King is now.

Who is Don King?

Don King and Muhammad Ali pictured in March 1975 in New York CityCredit: Bettmann/Getty

King is a prominent boxing promoter who has worked with some of the most successful boxers over the course of his 50-year career. He organized the famed 1974 "Rumble in the Jungle" heavyweight championship fight between Ali and Foreman; a 1975 fight between Ali andChuck Wepner; and a 1975 match between Ali and Frazier.

Over the next 20 years, King continued promoting prominent boxersTyson, Larry Holmes, Chávez, Evander Holyfield, Aaron Pryor and Marco Antonio Barrera, among many others.

However, his career was riddled with controversies stemming from past crimes and fraud allegations. Before his career took off, King served nearly four years in prison for second-degree murder. The charge was later reduced to manslaughter, he was released from prison and pardoned by Gov. James Rhodes in 1983.

A year earlier, Ali sued King and accused him of cutting over $1 million from a fight he earned, perThe New York Times. King allegedly ended the lawsuit by convincing Ali's friend to give the boxer a suitcase of $50,000 in exchange for signing a letter dismissing the suit, according to the 2003 book,The Life and Crimes of Don King: The Shame of Boxing in America.

Since then, several of King's former boxers have sued him on similar allegations of fraud.

Holmes alleged that over the course of his career, King cheated him out of $10 million; they eventually settled for $150,000, per the book. Tyson sued King for $100 million before settling for $14 million, according to NBC Sports. Other lawsuits that King settled for millions of dollars included cases with Terry Norris, Tim Witherspoon and Chris Byrd, among others.

"I found out that someone I believed was my surrogate father, my brother, my blood figure turns out to be the true Uncle Tom, the true n-----, the true sellout. He did more bad to Black fighters than any White promoter ever in the history of boxing," Tyson said of King in a 2001ESPN profile.

When did he work with Michael Jackson?

The Jacksons with Don King during a Victory Tour press conference on Nov. 20, 1983, in New York CityCredit: Sonia Moskowitz/Getty

In early 1983, the six Jackson brothers — Michael, Jermaine, Randy, Tito, Marlon and Jackie — met with several promoters to discuss their highly-anticipated Victory Tour.

After meeting with King twice, the Jackson brothers and their father, Joe, signed a contract with him on Sept. 30, 1983, perRolling Stone. The contract stipulated that King was the Jacksons' employee, so the Jacksons still had "final say on all aspects of the tour."

However, Michael's lawyer and manager,John Branca, later claimed that King was "not Michael’s first choice to promote the tour," but he promised to pay an upfront advance of $3 million — $500,000 per brother — if chosen as their promoter.

Advertisement

"You’re taking the number-one artist in the world; you would normally want somebody who has some experience in the music business," Branca told the publication in March 1984. "Don King was not Michael’s first choice to promote the tour. This tour is important to Michael because it’s important to Michael’s family. I’m not sure the tour was Michael’s first choice. He might have preferred to do other things."

He continued, "But he found it important to tour at his brothers’ request and his family’s request. They very much wanted to work with Don King. So Michael said, ‘If it’s that important to my father and my family, I will work with Don King.' "

The Jacksons made the tour announcement with King as their promoter in a press conference on Nov. 30, 1983.

Did Don King and Michael Jackson have a falling out?

Marlon, Michael and Jesse Jackson with Don King in San Francisco, Calif., in July 1984Credit: Robert R. McElroy/Getty

Before the Jacksons even embarked on the tour in 1984, the family and King had already run into issues over how to promote the shows and sell tickets — including causing controversy for forcing fans to buy a minimum of four tickets at an expensive rate in a mail-in lottery system.

Another point of tension came when the Jacksons were prepared to sign a contract with the Quaker Oats Company to sponsor the tour, but King had already signed an exclusive deal with Pepsi for 40% less than Quaker, as Branca alleged toRolling Stone.

The tension culminated with Michael allegedly writing a letter to King where he instructed him on how he should behave moving forward.

In the letter, King was allegedly told "not to communicate with anyone on Michael Jackson’s behalf without prior permission; that all moneys paid to Michael Jackson for his participation in the tour would be collected by Michael Jackson's personal representatives, not by Don King; that King did not have permission to approach any promoters, sponsors or any other persons on Michael’s behalf; that King was not to hire any personnel, any local promoters, book any halls or, for that matter, doanythingwithout Michael Jackson’s personal approval," per the publication.

When asked about the letter in February 1985, King said, "I don’t know anything about it."

Amid ongoing feuds with Michael, his brothers and King, Michael stunned everyone involved when he announced during their performance at L.A.'s Dodger Stadium on Dec. 9, 1984, that that performance with his brothers would be his last. The tour, which was expected to continue in Europe and Australia, was cut short.

After the final show, King was allegedly fuming and said, per the 2010 bookMichael Jackson: The Magic, The Madness, The Whole Story, "There's no way Michael Jackson should be as big as he is and treat his family the way he does."

"He feels his father done him wrong? His father may have done some wrong, but he also had to do a whole lot right," he allegedly continued saying, while mocking Michael for thinking of himself as a "megastar."

The comments reportedly left Michael enraged, and he subsequently told Branca to "sue his ass."

"That guy has been pushing my last nerve since Day One," he reportedly told Branca, who later "convinced him to let it go."

Where is Don King now?

Don King attends the welterweight fight between Adrien Broner and Blair Cobbs at Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino - Hard Rock Cafe Hollywood on June 7, 2024 in Hollywood, Fla.Credit: Chris Arjoon/Getty

As of 2026, King is in his 90s and has taken a step back from the boxing world. While he hasn't promoted a major event in years, he has occasionally promoted smaller fights.

King gave a rare press conference for a fight featuring Adrien Broner in May 2023 and later stepped out for a fight between Broner and Blair Cobbs in Hollywood, Fla., in June 2024.

However, King's legal issues remain ongoing, as a promoting company sued him for $3 billion on allegations of defamation, tortious interference and fraud in January 2025, perNBC News.

Read the original article onPeople

Where Is Don King Now? All About the Promoter's Tumultuous Life After Working with Michael Jackson

Don King is a prominent boxing promoter whose career has faced several controversies NEED TO KNOW King worked with...
The Latest: Supreme Court to hear arguments on ending legal protections for Haitian/Syrian migrants

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will weigh arguments Wednesday over theTrump administration’s push to end legal protections for Haitians and Syriansas migrants fleeing war and natural disaster.

Associated Press A person holds up a sign in support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, known as DACA, and Temporary Protected Status programs during a rally in support of DACA and TPS outside of the White House, in Washington, Sept. 5, 2017. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, file) FILE - An American flag waves in front of the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Nov. 2, 2020. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)

Supreme Court TPS

Haitians and Syrians wereamong those from 17 countrieswith Temporary Protected Status, which allows migrants already in the U.S. to stay with work permits in 18-month increments, so long as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security deems their country of origin unsafe for return.

SincePresident Donald Trump’s second term began, Homeland Security has ended the protections for 13 countries,exposing their migrants to potential deportation.

The casefocuses on whether the administration properly weighed conditions in Haiti and Syria when it ended TPS and if it prejudiced non-white immigrants.

Here's the latest:

The new secretary gets the blame

This lawsuit originally was directed at Kristi Noem, who was Trump’s first Homeland Security secretary.

But when she was fired, and Markwayne Mullin was sworn in as the new DHS secretary, he also got the honor of being the person named in all the lawsuits.

Lawsuits tend to follow the head of the agency or department so when those people change, the new secretary or agency head takes over the role of being named in all the lawsuits, even if they happened before he or she took office.

This even happens when administrations change. For example, advocates sued the first Trump administration over its efforts to terminate TPS, specifically naming his DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

But by the time the case concluded six years later, it was Biden’s DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas who was named in the suit.

How temporary is temporary?

One of the key complaints by conservatives about TPS is that something that is supposed to be temporary essentially becomes permanent.

Republicans often point to TPS designations that are extended repeatedly, even after the reason for the original designation has long passed.

The TPS designation for El Salvador, for example, was first designated in 2001 following devastating earthquakes in the country.

But immigration advocates say there’s no time limit on TPS use, and the administration is trying to send people back to countries still in turmoil.

Conditions in Syria

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, also known as the UN Refugee Agency, says that Syria’s operational contexts reflect a dual dynamic of large-scale returns and persistent humanitarian needs.

As of March 2026, 15.6 million Syrians required assistance, while over 1.5 million refugees and 1.8 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) have returned since December 2024, according to the agency.

“Internal displacement remains high (5.5 million), underscoring that returns are occurring within a still-fragile system with strained absorption capacity,” said the UN agency in a report.

Conditions in Haiti

Haiti has not had a president since Jovenel Moïse was killed in July 2021 at his private residence.

The government hopes to hold the first round of elections by year’s end, but experts say that’s unlikely given the surge in gang violence.

A recent assessment from the International Rescue Committee (IRC) assessment reveals “grave protection risks and rapidly shrinking access to public services” for civilians in Haiti, as the country faces one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world.

Advertisement

The report notes that conditions could deteriorate further as political instability and violence and clashes between gangs and security forces continue.

“Millions of people in Haiti continue to face a compounding crisis of food insecurity, forced displacement, deadly disease outbreaks, and surging violence,” said Alice Ribes, emergency country director for the IRC in Haiti. “Public services in many areas have collapsed under gang rule, leaving people with limited or no access to clean drinking water, food, medical care, and education.”

Bill to protect TPS

On April 16, in a rare bipartisan moment, the House passed legislation that would extend TPS for Haitians.

The bill, pushed forward by House Democrats with a group of Republicans over the objections ofthe GOP leadership, would require a three-year extension of temporary protected status for Haitians by the Trump administration. That would allow hundreds of thousands of qualifying immigrants to remain in the United States without fear of deportation.

But it faces uncertainty in the Senate, and President Trump would almost certainly seek to veto it.

Democratic lawmakers urge the SCOTUS to support TPS

Democratic Senator Edward J. Markey and Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, both of Massachusetts, Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester, of Delaware, and Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, of Florida, asked the Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject the administrations attempts to terminate TPS.

They were joined by a coalition of senior, workers and advocates from the American Business Immigration Coalition, and the National Domestic Workers Alliance, among other organizations.

“TPS holders serve as a backbone for families and our economy—caring for our elders and loved ones through illness, strengthening our communities, and making innumerable contributions daily,” Pressley. “Our message to the Supreme Court today is simple: do your job, uphold the law, save lives, and protect our communities.”

What the administration says

The administration’s claims that TPS holders can safely return to their home countries, where conditions have changed since the protection was originally granted.

Advocates argue that safe conditions do not exist for people to return to their countries of origin. They point out that the government is engaging in a contradiction, given that the State Department warns U.S. citizens not to travel to Haiti or Syria due to violence, instability, and limited access to basic services.

“These terminations have come without credible evidence that conditions have improved,” said Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, president and Chief Executive Officer of Global Refuge, one of the largest faith-based nonprofit organizations serving refugees.

“The administration is essentially arguing two things at once: that these countries are too dangerous for American tourists, but safe enough to deport families to. Policy makers cannot credibly hold both positions at the same time,” Vignarajah said.

What advocates say

Immigrant advocates argue that the administration’s decision to end TPS is not based on conditions in the countries of origin. They contend that, on the contrary, it is part of a broader policy aimed at deporting not only those who entered the country illegally, but also hundreds of thousands of people who have been residing in the country legally.

“By trying to kill TPS, they are attacking people who are living and working here legally, paying fees and taxes, following all the rules,” said José Palma, coordinator at the National TPS Alliance. “They are de-documenting people… it’s cruel, arbitrary, pointless, needless, and wrong.”

Viles Dorsainvil, Co-Founder and Executive Director, Haitian Support Center, and a Haitian TPS holder, said “TPS provides dignity, stability, and hope... TPS represents more than protection. It represents the ability of families to stay together.”

Public Rights Project, a non-governmental that helps local governments with litigation, filed an amicus brief outlining the economic, workforce and public service impacts cities would face if TPS is revoked.

The brief was filed on April 13 on behalf of a coalition of 47 local governments, mayors and local leaders across the country urging the Court to preserve TPS.

Settle in for a lengthy session

The court has set aside 80 minutes for arguments, but it would be unsurprising if they last two hours or longer.

Justice Clarence Thomas goes first

In the post-pandemic era, the other justices allow the 77-year-old Thomas, the longest-serving member of the court, to pose a question or two before the free-for-all begins. In a second round of questioning, the justices ask questions in order of seniority. Chief Justice John Roberts, whose center chair makes him the most senior, gets the first crack.

Court begins at 10 a.m., Eastern time, but the livestream won’t start right away

The justices have some business to take care of before arguments get going. They’ll issue a decision in at least one case that was argued during the fall or winter, and the justice who wrote the majority opinion in each case will read a summary from the bench. Then, the court will ceremonially swear in lawyers to the Supreme Court bar. Once that’s done, the livestream should begin.

The Latest: Supreme Court to hear arguments on ending legal protections for Haitian/Syrian migrants

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will weigh arguments Wednesday over theTrump administration’s push to end legal protections for Hai...
Kate Middleton and Prince William Celebrate Their 15th Wedding Anniversary with New Family Photo

Fifteen years ago today,Kate Middleton married Prince Williamin a fairytale royal wedding at Westminster Abbey.

Town & Country

To mark the milestone anniversary, the royals shared a new family photograph, taken by Matt Porteous during a Wales family holiday to Cornwall earlier this month. In the picture, the Prince and Princess of Wales lay in a field surrounded by their children—and William pets their dog, Orla.

The couplemet as students at the University of St. Andrews, livedtogether as roommates, and got engaged in 2010. For her big day, Kate worethe Cartier Halo Tiaraand a dress designed by Sarah Burton for Alexander McQueen, and William wore his Irish Guards uniform, but later changed into the black Blues and Royals uniform. Upon their marriage, Queen Elizabeth granted the couple the titles the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, but after King Charles ascended to throne,they became the Prince and Princess of Wales.

Advertisement

As King Charles and Queen Camilla undertake a State Visit to the U.S., it is a relatively quiet week for Prince William and Kate. This past weekend,Kate represented King Charles during Anzac Day services, while yesterday, William visited the RAF (Royal Air Force) Valley airbase as part of its 85th anniversary celebrations.

During CNN’s live coverage of King Charles and Queen Camilla’s State Visit to the U.S. yesterday morning, one of the commentators noted that Prince William and Kate Middleton are set to visit the U.S. this summer. It was previously thought that William would travel to the U.S. during the World Cup, though whether or not Kate will join him is as yet unclear. As of this writing, there is no official confirmation, or comment from Kensington Palace, on the potential U.S. trip.

You Might Also Like

Kate Middleton and Prince William Celebrate Their 15th Wedding Anniversary with New Family Photo

Fifteen years ago today,Kate Middleton married Prince Williamin a fairytale royal wedding at Westminster Abbey. To mark the miles...
Reform UK bus and taxi the only vehicles at Jenrick’s ‘national fuel protest’ as march called off

Reform UK’s“fairfuel” protest failed to draw support on Monday, with the planned march down Whitehall called off amid a small turnout.

The Independent US

Billed as “national fuel protest”, the protest was shared on seniorReform UKmembers’ social media, including the party’s treasury spokesperson,Robert Jenrick.

The AI-generated poster advertising the event on social media featured an array of tractors, lorries and vans positioned in front of parliament.

But asReform UK’s double-decker bus and taxi turned on to Whitehall – 40 minutes after the advertised start time of 9am – no other vehicles had materialised.

Only dozens of spectators gathered on the street by the bus, the majority from the media, with just a small handful of Reform UK supporters attending.

The event was also supposed to include a march down Whitehall, but the moving demonstration was called off.

Mr Jenrick, who was leading the protest alongside Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice, MP Sarah Pochin and London mayoral candidate Laila Cunningham, said the group had been “driving around central London ... talking to punters”

Only a few dozen spectators gathered on the street by the bus, the majority from the media (The Independent)

“People have been hooting their horns in support of us,” he said. “We’re here to send a very strong message toRachel Reeves, the chancellor: do something now to help our hard-pressed motorists.

Advertisement

“Chancellors and finance ministers all over the world, from Australia to Germany to Sweden to Spain to Ireland, are acting to lighten the load.”

Reform UK is calling on Ms Reeves to not go ahead with the increase in fuel duty planned for September and to implement an “emergency cut now”.

Labour have been under pressure to lay out measures to protect Britons amid the rising prices and uncertainty amid the ongoing blockade on the Strait of Hormuz as a result of the war in Iran.

“If you’re listening, Rachel Reeves – and I did invite her here today last week, she didn’t say that – but if she’s cowering at one of the windows of the Treasury behind us, listen,” Mr Jenrick added.

Reform UK is calling on Rachel Reeves not to go ahead with the increase in fuel duty planned for September, and to implement an ‘emergency cut now’ (Getty)

“Listen to the millions of Brits who are finding life hard at the moment. Take action. Lighten the load. Cut fuel duty now.”

Oil prices hit a near three-week high on Monday, as the key oil route remains closed while peace talks between the US and Iran stall.

Negotiations between Iran and the US have broken down once more, with Donald Trump declaring over the weekend that envoys would no longer be travelling to Pakistan for talks due to a lack of progress.

Mr Trump told Fox News on Sunday: “If they want, we can talk, but we’re not sending people.”

Speaking on Monday, Sir Keir Starmer reiterated that the government had capped household energy costs until July, regardless of what happens in Iran, while fuel duty is scheduled to remain frozen until September.

Reform UK bus and taxi the only vehicles at Jenrick’s ‘national fuel protest’ as march called off

Reform UK’s“fairfuel” protest failed to draw support on Monday, with the planned march down Whitehall called off amid a small turnout. ...

 

NEO MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com