A good movie trilogy usually comes down to a few simple things. You need a story that was meant to unfold in three parts, characters who actually grow from the first film to the last, and a clear ending. Each movie should feel complete on its own while still advancing the bigger story.
The problem is that this is harder than it sounds. Too often, when the first film succeeds, the studio sees the numbers, and suddenly the goal shifts from telling a tight story to extending a brand. That is usually when the cracks begin to show.
Jurassic World
Credit: IMDb
Seeing a fully operational dinosaur park for the first time is exciting. That idea alone generated much of the early buzz around Jurassic World. But as the trilogy unfolded between 2015 and 2022, the focus shifted more toward bigger action and global chaos than tight suspense. Escaped dinosaurs became a familiar pattern, and the cautionary edge that made Jurassic Park resonate faded into the background.
The Hobbit
Credit: IMDb
The trilogy began with a lot of goodwill. Peter Jackson had already delivered The Lord of the Rings, so An Unexpected Journey benefited from that trust. The first film relies on strong performances and the comfort of returning to Middle-earth, which helps smooth over early pacing issues. However, stretching a single book into nearly nine hours created obvious strain. Heavy CGI and extended battle sequences in the later films start to feel inflated as well.
The Hangover
Credit: IMDb
The first The Hangover was unexpected and sharp, which is why it dominated 2009. The Las Vegas setting, the mystery of what happened the night before, and the escalating chaos all clicked at once. The sequels moved quickly to capitalize on that success, but they relied heavily on the same missing-friend structure and pushed the shock humor further each time. By the time The Hangover Part III abandoned the original formula, the series felt scattered and less focused.
Alvin and the Chipmunks
Credit: IMDb
In 2007, hordes of families turned out for Alvin and the Chipmunks. The live-action format brought the animated characters back to life and quickly launched a franchise. The problem was substance. Each sequel relied more heavily on pop song covers and exaggerated slapstick. The box-office numbers held up for a while, but the critical response declined with each louder, increasingly repetitive installment aimed squarely at young audiences.
Divergent
Credit: IMDb
Advertisement
Divergent is a reminder of how quickly franchise momentum can evaporate. When it launched in 2014, it tapped into a strong teen audience already invested in dystopian storytelling. The first film generated interest, but each subsequent sequel drew less enthusiasm. By the time Allegiant arrived, box office returns and audience engagement had dropped enough to derail the planned finale. The series ended without properly completing its story.
Fifty Shades
Credit: IMDb
Financial success does not equal creative growth, as this series shows. In 2015, Fifty Shades of Grey turned controversy into massive ticket sales. Critics focused on stiff acting and awkward dialogue, but the profits guaranteed sequels. Fifty Shades Darker and Fifty Shades Freed repeated the same relationship beats.
365 Days
Credit: IMDb
Streaming algorithms amplified attention in 2020, and 365 Days quickly dominated Netflix's worldwide charts. The plot centered on coercive romance, which critics flagged immediately. Its two sequels, released within two years, followed a similar structure and received a weaker reception.
The Human Centipede
Credit: IMDb
The Human Centipede became infamous in 2009 through word of mouth. Its shock value drove attention, but craft remained minimal. The sequels repeated the premise with meta commentary and prison settings, which kept the franchise's notoriety alive while offering little improvement in storytelling quality across three films released over six years under the same director.
In the Name of the King
Credit: IMDb
When Uwe Boll released In the Name of the King in 2007, many fantasy fans were already skeptical. Casting Jason Statham drew some initial curiosity, but uneven writing and execution quickly undercut that interest. The follow-up films shifted direction and replaced the lead, which only made the series feel more disconnected. By the time the trilogy wrapped in 2013, it had earned a reputation as one of the weaker fantasy runs of that era.
Atlas Shrugged
Credit: IMDb
At the bottom of this ranking is a rare case in which nearly every creative and production choice worked against the trilogy. Dividing Ayn Rand's novel into three films sounded ambitious, but the execution doomed Atlas Shrugged from the start in 2011. Each installment swapped casts and directors, which fractured continuity. The ideology overwhelmed character development, and by 2014, the whole thing ended after years of attempts to be relevant failed to translate effectively onscreen.